Friday, December 2, 2011
Learning Too Late of Perils in Gas Well Leases
by IAN URBINA and JO CRAVEN McGINTY
Energy company officials say that standard leases include language that protects landowners. But a review of more than 111,000 leases, addenda and related documents by The New York Times suggests otherwise:
After Scott Ely and his father talked with salesmen from an energy company about signing the lease allowing gas drilling on their land in northeastern Pennsylvania, he said he felt certain it required the company to leave the property as good as new.
So Mr. Ely said he was surprised several years later when the drilling company, Cabot Oil and Gas, informed them that rather than draining and hauling away the toxic drilling sludge stored in large waste ponds on the property, it would leave the waste, cover it with dirt and seed the area with grass. He knew that waste pond liners can leak, seeping contaminated waste.
“I guess our terms should have been clearer” about requiring the company to remove the waste pits after drilling, said Mr. Ely, of Dimock, Pa., who sued Cabot after his drinking water from a separate property was contaminated. “We learned that the hard way.”
Americans have signed millions of leases allowing companies to drill for oil and natural gas on their land in recent years. But some of these landowners — often in rural areas, and eager for quick payouts — are finding out too late what is, and what is not, in the fine print.
¶ Fewer than half the leases require companies to compensate landowners for water contamination after drilling begins. And only about half the documents have language that lawyers suggest should be included to require payment for damages to livestock or crops.
¶ Most leases grant gas companies broad rights to decide where they can cut down trees, store chemicals, build roads and drill. Companies are also permitted to operate generators and spotlights through the night near homes during drilling.
¶ In the leases, drilling companies rarely describe to landowners the potential environmental and other risks that federal laws require them to disclose in filings to investors.
¶ Most leases are for three or five years, but at least two-thirds of those reviewed by The Times allow extensions without additional approval from landowners. If landowners have second thoughts about drilling on their land or want to negotiate for more money, they may be out of luck.
The leases — obtained through open records requests — are mostly from gas-rich areas inTexas, but also in Maryland, NewYork, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Colorado and , some landowners have had
to spend hundreds of dollars a month to buy bottled water or maintain large
tanks, known as water buffaloes, for drinking water in their front yards. They
said they learned only after the fact that the leases did not require gas
companies to pay for replacement drinking water if their wells were
contaminated, and despite state regulations, not all costs were covered. West Virginia
Thousands of landowners in
have joined class action lawsuits claiming that they were paid less than they
expected because gas companies deducted costs like
hauling chemicals to the well site or transporting the gas to market. Texas
Some industry officials say the criticism of their business practices is misguided. Asked about the waste pits on Mr. Ely’s land in
for example, George Stark, a Cabot spokesman, said the company’s cleanup
measures met or exceeded state requirements. And the door-to-door salesmen,
commonly known as landmen, who pitch the leases on behalf of the drilling
companies also dismiss similar complaints from landowners, and say they do not
mislead anyone. Pennsylvania
The Sales Pitch
“There are bad leases out there, and, as with any industry, there have also been some unscrupulous opportunists,” said Mike Knapp, president of Knapp Acquisitions and Production, a company in western
that brokers deals between landowners and drilling companies. “But everyone I
know who does this work is on the up and up, and most of the bad actors that
there may have been before are no longer in business.” Pennsylvania
He said that his company’s leases ensure that landowners will get replacement water. The company also encourages landowners to visit an existing drilling site before signing a lease to get an idea of the potential noise and truck traffic. Some of the complaints about leases, he said, are just sour grapes from landowners who are envious about the amount of money they believe their neighbors are earning in bonuses and royalties.
To be sure, many landowners have earned small fortunes from drilling leases. Last year, natural gas companies paid more than $1.6 billion in lease and bonus payments to
according to a report commissioned by the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an
industry trade group. Chesapeake Energy, one of the largest natural gas
companies, has paid more than $183.8 million in royalties in Pennsylvania this year, according to
its Web site. Texas
Much of the money has gone to residents in rural areas where jobs are scarce and farmers and ranchers have struggled to stay afloat. Mr. Ely once worked for a company owned by Cabot on drilling sites in his area, until he was fired shortly after publicly complaining about Cabot’s drilling practices.
But many landowners and lawyers say that gas companies are intentionally vague in their contracts and use high-pressure sales tactics on landowners.
“If you’ve never seen a good lease, or any lease, how are you supposed to know what terms to try to get in yours?” said Ron Stamets, a drilling proponent and a Web site developer in Lakewood, Pa., who started a consumer protection Web site, PAGasLeases.com, in 2008 so that he could swap advice with his neighbors as he prepared to sign a gas lease. Others have also taken steps to better inform landowners about the details in leases. In the past several years, the attorneys general in
New York, Ohio and have
published advisories about the pitfalls of leasing land for drilling. Pennsylvania
State regulations also provide protections to landowners above and beyond what is in their leases.
At least eight states specifically require companies to compensate landowners for damage to their properties or to negotiate with them about where wells will be drilled, even if the lease does not provide those protections.
Asked about the leases, officials from Exxon Mobil, the largest natural gas producer in the
declined to comment. United States
Read the rest of this article at the New York Times